The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
Blog Article
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
14. Inside the light on the position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and because only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is additionally a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or read more whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for your loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment around the offender, making certain They can be held accountable for their actions.
The Court regarded as the case to become maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the danger and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
Accessing free case legislation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anyone seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
VI) The petitioner is behind the bars considering the fact that arrest, investigation from the case is complete, he is no more required for your purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him behind the bars before conclusion of trial will serve no useful purpose.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
However, it’s essential to note that the application in the death penalty is matter to several legal safeguards and because of process to be sure fair trials.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.